Skip to content

Meta Expert: Cross-Layer Expert Sharing for Storage- and Retrieval-Efficient MoE

Paper · arXiv 2610.27598 · daily list of October 23, 2026

Ermo Hua, Xiangyu Hong, Baiting Wu, Che Jiang, Haozheng Hou, Yicheng Gu and 8 more · TsinghuaC3I

Collected · snapshot shipped with the site build, not a live feed

Abstract · as written by the authors

As model parameters scale up, sparsely activated Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) approaches have become essential for model scaling. However, mainstream models currently adopt hierarchical architectures, where experts in different layers, although topologically independent, exhibit substantial similarity and redundancy in their stored content. Compared to the hierarchically arranged Local Expert in existing mainstream models, we hypothesize that inter-layer shared Meta Expert hold greater potential. To this end, we conduct a multi-dimensional empirical comparison between Local and Meta Experts, and find that models incorporating Meta Experts exhibit lower parameter redundancy, together with lower cross-entropy loss and higher downstream task accuracy. With the activated quantity and the expert granularity held fixed, our model matches the performance of Vanilla MoE using only 70--80\% of the experts, substantially improving the model's scaling potential. Beyond removing inter-layer redundancy among experts and improving information storage efficiency, our theoretical analysis further shows that, compared with Local Experts, Meta Experts provide hidden states with more flexible residual pathways, thereby improving information retrieval efficiency.

This is the original abstract from arXiv. It has not been summarised, translated or rewritten.

Terms in plain language

Automatic

Made by matching the words of the title and abstract against a fixed list of definitions. It does not read the paper and does not change the abstract above.

MoE
a model made of many specialist parts, of which only a few run for each input.

Questions about this paper

Where can I read the full paper?

On arXiv, under the identifier 2610.27598: the abstract page is https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27598 and the PDF is https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.27598. The text on this page is the authors' abstract, not a summary.

Is there code for this paper?

No repository is attached to the paper on Hugging Face. The authors may still have released code; the abstract or the PDF would say so.

What do the upvotes mean?

25 signed-in Hugging Face users upvoted it on the daily list of October 23, 2026. Upvotes measure attention from that community, not peer review.

What are the plain-language terms under the abstract?

Short notes on the technical words of the title and abstract, in everyday English, taken from a fixed list of definitions that we wrote. They are made automatically by matching words, so a note can miss a term or give a meaning that does not fit this paper. The abstract above them is the authors’ text and is not changed.