Skip to content

Policy-Mask: Budget-Aware Adaptation of Diffusion Features to Discriminative Tasks

Paper · arXiv 2610.28889 · daily list of October 23, 2026

Ivan Listopadov, Maksim Nakhodnov, Aibek Alanov

Collected · snapshot shipped with the site build, not a live feed

Abstract · as written by the authors

Selecting intermediate features from a frozen diffusion model for discriminative tasks is non-trivial because the useful signal is distributed across the denoising trajectory, network depth, and channels. In practice, this requires choosing a timestep, a block, and a channel subset. Existing methods either fix these choices by hand or optimize only a few extraction hyperparameters, most often the timestep, then reuse the same rule across inputs and budgets. We introduce Policy-Mask, a budget-conditioned policy trained on the downstream objective that jointly selects all three under a prescribed channel budget. Without normalization, the channel-score contribution grows with the number of selected channels and dominates the timestep and block updates. We normalize it by subset cardinality, keeping the three policy heads on comparable scales and stabilizing joint training. At matched budgets, Policy-Mask improves over fixed extraction and feature-filter baselines across segmentation, classification, and semantic correspondence, reaching 38.9 mIoU on ADE20K, 75.4% top-1 on CIFAR-100 at 128 dimensions, and 76.3 PCK@0.1 on SPair-71k. Component-wise ablations show that block selection materially affects downstream accuracy, and the highest recorded channel-budget score occurs at 256 retained channels, identifying a practical operating point for compact diffusion representations. We further adapt Policy-Mask to diffusion transformers, including PixArt-Σ and SD3.5 MMDiT, by replacing U-Net channels with image-token hidden dimensions.

This is the original abstract from arXiv. It has not been summarised, translated or rewritten.

Terms in plain language

Automatic

Made by matching the words of the title and abstract against a fixed list of definitions. It does not read the paper and does not change the abstract above.

Diffusion
a way of generating data by learning to turn random noise into a clean result, step by step.
ablations
a test that removes one part of a system to see how much that part contributes.
transformers
the neural-network design behind most modern language models, where attention lets each word weigh the other words in the text.
token
a small unit that a model reads and writes, often a part of a word.

Questions about this paper

Where can I read the full paper?

On arXiv, under the identifier 2610.28889: the abstract page is https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28889 and the PDF is https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.28889. The text on this page is the authors' abstract, not a summary.

Is there code for this paper?

No repository is attached to the paper on Hugging Face. The authors may still have released code; the abstract or the PDF would say so.

What do the upvotes mean?

30 signed-in Hugging Face users upvoted it on the daily list of October 23, 2026. Upvotes measure attention from that community, not peer review.

What are the plain-language terms under the abstract?

Short notes on the technical words of the title and abstract, in everyday English, taken from a fixed list of definitions that we wrote. They are made automatically by matching words, so a note can miss a term or give a meaning that does not fit this paper. The abstract above them is the authors’ text and is not changed.