Skip to content

DynaFlow: Learning Free-Form Multi-Agent Orchestration

Paper · arXiv 2610.34467 · daily list of October 27, 2026

Ruhao Liu, Qi Li, Shizun Wang, Xinchao Wang · National University of Singapore

Collected · snapshot shipped with the site build, not a live feed

Abstract · as written by the authors

Multi-agent systems often rely on predefined collaboration structures, limiting their ability to adapt to diverse task requirements. We introduce DynaFlow, a framework that integrates free-form executable workflow synthesis into the action space of the main agent. The agent decides when collaboration is needed and generates task-specific programs that coordinate sub-agents through sequential or parallel execution, structured information exchange, and verification. Execution results and traces inform subsequent actions, enabling the agent to adapt collaboration as reasoning progresses. We train only the main agent through supervised fine-tuning on distilled trajectories, followed by refinement on examples filtered for unsupported premises, biased verification, and information-flow defects. All sub-agents remain fixed, separating orchestration learning from executor capability improvement. Across six benchmarks spanning mathematical reasoning, scientific question answering, and multi-hop retrieval, DynaFlow achieves 88.08% overall accuracy in Forced mode, outperforming the strongest evaluated baseline by 10.90 percentage points with the same Qwen3.5-27B backbone. Workflow analysis finds more explicit use, verification, and refinement of upstream outputs after training, highlighting cross-stage information flow as a key dimension of multi-agent orchestration.

This is the original abstract from arXiv. It has not been summarised, translated or rewritten.

Terms in plain language

Automatic

Made by matching the words of the title and abstract against a fixed list of definitions. It does not read the paper and does not change the abstract above.

Agent
an AI system that plans and takes several steps, often by calling tools, towards a goal.
fine-tuning
further training of an existing model on a narrower set of examples, to suit a task.
distilled
training a smaller model to copy the behaviour of a larger one.
benchmarks
a fixed set of tasks or questions used to compare models on the same test.

Questions about this paper

Where can I read the full paper?

On arXiv, under the identifier 2610.34467: the abstract page is https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34467 and the PDF is https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.34467. The text on this page is the authors' abstract, not a summary.

Is there code for this paper?

Yes. The paper's page on Hugging Face links the repository github.com/amiya-special/Dynaflow, which had 3 stars when we collected it.

What do the upvotes mean?

28 signed-in Hugging Face users upvoted it on the daily list of October 27, 2026. Upvotes measure attention from that community, not peer review.

What are the plain-language terms under the abstract?

Short notes on the technical words of the title and abstract, in everyday English, taken from a fixed list of definitions that we wrote. They are made automatically by matching words, so a note can miss a term or give a meaning that does not fit this paper. The abstract above them is the authors’ text and is not changed.