Skip to content

TAO: Tool-Aware Joint Scheduling for LLM-Based Agentic Serving

Paper · arXiv 2610.37230 · daily list of October 29, 2026

Shuhuai Li, Shengdong Ye, Dongdong Ge, Yinyu Ye, Jianghao Lin · AIOR

Collected · snapshot shipped with the site build, not a live feed

Abstract · as written by the authors

Agentic services alternate between model inference on clustered GPUs and external tools on distributed CPUs. In this scenario, existing systems (1) overlook tool-return readiness in service evaluation, wasting limited resources, and (2) use heuristic strategies to decide admission and placement on GPUs, resulting in suboptimal scheduling decisions. To bridge this gap, we present TAO, a tool-aware joint scheduling framework for LLM-based agentic serving. Its value interface combines near-term tool readiness, node-specific cache credit with time-aware decay, and token footprint; a dynamic program jointly selects and places waiting sessions under capacity constraints. Across the 12 reported model-workload-concurrency settings, TAO reduces latency by up to 26.8%, reduces mean time to first token (TTFT) by up to 36.3%, and increases decode throughput by up to 29.5% relative to the best evaluated state-of-the-art baseline for each metric.

This is the original abstract from arXiv. It has not been summarised, translated or rewritten.

Terms in plain language

Automatic

Made by matching the words of the title and abstract against a fixed list of definitions. It does not read the paper and does not change the abstract above.

LLM
an AI system trained on very large amounts of text to read and write language.
Agentic
an AI system that plans and takes several steps, often by calling tools, towards a goal.
token
a small unit that a model reads and writes, often a part of a word.
state-of-the-art
the best published result on a task so far, measured on a given benchmark.

Questions about this paper

Where can I read the full paper?

On arXiv, under the identifier 2610.37230: the abstract page is https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37230 and the PDF is https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.37230. The text on this page is the authors' abstract, not a summary.

Is there code for this paper?

No repository is attached to the paper on Hugging Face. The authors may still have released code; the abstract or the PDF would say so.

What do the upvotes mean?

2 signed-in Hugging Face users upvoted it on the daily list of October 29, 2026. Upvotes measure attention from that community, not peer review.

What are the plain-language terms under the abstract?

Short notes on the technical words of the title and abstract, in everyday English, taken from a fixed list of definitions that we wrote. They are made automatically by matching words, so a note can miss a term or give a meaning that does not fit this paper. The abstract above them is the authors’ text and is not changed.