Skip to content

ThinkWorld: World Imagination Reinforces Chain-of-Dynamics Reasoning

Paper · arXiv 2610.37666 · daily list of October 28, 2026

Chaehyun Kim, Chi-Pin Huang, Jisoo Kim, Min-Hung Chen, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, Seungryong Kim and 1 more · NVIDIA

Collected · snapshot shipped with the site build, not a live feed

Abstract · as written by the authors

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have made substantial progress in robotic manipulation, but their generalization remains constrained by the diversity and coverage of action-labeled robot demonstrations. Human videos provide much broader behavioral and environmental experience, while learning from them faces a fundamental trade-off between scalable data and explicit action grounding. We introduce ThinkWorld, a VLA learning framework that grounds action reasoning in world dynamics and strengthens it through reinforcement learning with world imagination. ThinkWorld represents each action thought as a Chain-of-Dynamics (CoD), a sequence of discrete motion tokens that captures the intermediate dynamics connecting the current world to a future state and serves as a common action representation across embodiments. We first initialize CoD with action-labeled demonstrations, then predict the future induced by each CoD and reinforce those whose predictions better match the observed outcome. This enables videos without action annotations to provide direct supervision from observed state transitions, allowing human and robot experience to refine the same reasoning space. Experiments in simulation and on real robots demonstrate effective human-to-robot transfer and strong generalization to unseen tasks and environments.

This is the original abstract from arXiv. It has not been summarised, translated or rewritten.

Terms in plain language

Automatic

Made by matching the words of the title and abstract against a fixed list of definitions. It does not read the paper and does not change the abstract above.

reinforcement learning
training by trial and error: good actions earn a reward, and the model adjusts to earn more.
tokens
a small unit that a model reads and writes, often a part of a word.

Questions about this paper

Where can I read the full paper?

On arXiv, under the identifier 2610.37666: the abstract page is https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37666 and the PDF is https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.37666. The text on this page is the authors' abstract, not a summary.

Is there code for this paper?

No repository is attached to the paper on Hugging Face. The authors may still have released code; the abstract or the PDF would say so.

What do the upvotes mean?

42 signed-in Hugging Face users upvoted it on the daily list of October 28, 2026. Upvotes measure attention from that community, not peer review.

What are the plain-language terms under the abstract?

Short notes on the technical words of the title and abstract, in everyday English, taken from a fixed list of definitions that we wrote. They are made automatically by matching words, so a note can miss a term or give a meaning that does not fit this paper. The abstract above them is the authors’ text and is not changed.